Carbonflux wrote:The problem for me is I don't like to be forced into a position where I have to say negative things about Cycles. This goes beyond apples and oranges, its like the difference between a Prius and a Lamborghini in city traffic, in a city a Prius is much faster.
SATtva wrote:The real issue at hand is to properly choose a tool for a given task.
jeanphi wrote:Also try LuxRender in path tracing mode with the lowdiscrepancy sampler and you'll probably find it to be as fast as Cycles.
jeanphi wrote:I don't completely agree with CarbonFlux on the speed argument, because eventhough we try to do our best to have efficient algorithm, we might miss important optimizations opportunities...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests